The following lawsuits, all filed by Sky Warrior US, LLC in New Jersey, reveal a striking pattern: large and varying sums claimed against U.S. tourists, months after their stays at the Baha Mar resort. In each case, the amounts are based entirely on documents generated within the casino, with no independent verification provided in the complaints.
These lawsuits are initiated by Sky Warrior US, LLC, a domestic entity used by Sky Warrior Bahamas Limited to enforce alleged gambling debts in U.S. courts. The litigation is carried out by Armstrong Teasdale LLP, a U.S. law firm that has taken on the role of advancing these claims despite the lack of independently verified evidence.
Lawsuits Filed by Sky Warrior US, LLC—Enabled by Armstrong Teasdale LLP, on Behalf of Sky Warrior Bahamas Limited:
| Defendant (Initials) | Docket No. | Amount Claimed | Filed By |
|---|---|---|---|
| A.M. | L-001374-24 | $50,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| M.C. | L-001241-23 | $60,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| D.L. | L-000538-24 | $240,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| G.X. | L-001901-24 | $120,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| T.H. | L-000612-24 | $600,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| B.K. | L-000260-24 | $12,000,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| E.L. | L-000449-23 | $410,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| M.M. | L-001027-23 | $24,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| R.O. | L-000443-23 | $120,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| C.R. | L-001025-23 | $60,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| C.S. | L-001071-23 | $100,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| F.T. | L-000478-24 | $470,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| L.V. | L-001026-23 | $50,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| K.W. | L-001262-23 | $140,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
| A.Y. | L-003059-23 | $50,000 | Armstrong Teasdale LLP |
The wide range in claimed amounts — from tens of thousands to over $12 million — likely reflects how marker amounts were calculated internally at Baha Mar, not actual gambling losses. Based on language in multiple complaints, it appears that the alleged marker value was assigned by the casino itself, possibly influenced by factors such as evaluation of tourists’ net worth.
No evidence is provided in the lawsuits showing that chips were delivered, wagers placed, or games played matching these sums. The amounts, while varying dramatically, all rely on documents generated inside the casino — not third-party verification or transactional receipts.
These lawsuits are not isolated. They represent a calculated legal strategy by an offshore casino network whose parent company has faced global scrutiny for its links to criminal enterprises, using American civil courts to impose silence, financial pressure, and reputational damage on tourists who are unlikely to fight back. What begins as a vacation ends with litigation. And the evidence? Internal casino forms — rarely signed, never witnessed, and never independently verified.